The US trade court on Thursday ruled against Donald Trump’s latest 10% global tariffs, finding across-the-board tariffs were not justified under a 1970s trade law. The US court of international trade ruled in favor of small businesses that challenged the tariffs, which took effect on 24 February. The ruling was 2-1, with one judge saying it was premature to grant victory to the small business plaintiffs.The states argued that the move was an attempt to sidestep a major US Supreme Court ruling, which struck down the Republican president's 2025 tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The small businesses had argued the new tariffs were an attempt to sidestep a landmark US supreme court decision that struck down the Republican president’s 2025 tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. In his February order, Trump invoked section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows for duties for up to 150 days to correct serious “balance of payments deficits” or head off an imminent depreciation of the dollar. The court ruling found the law was not an appropriate step for the kinds of trade deficits that Trump cited in his February order.
The court delivered a 2-1 verdict that applies only to the parties who had challenged the administration in court. On Thursday, the judges directed the defendants to comply with the order within 5 days and issue refunds to the importers involved in the case. Tariffs imposed on sectors such as steel, aluminium and automobiles will continue, as they are not covered by the Supreme Court’s decision. The administration had defended the move by pointing to a $1.2 trillion annual US goods trade deficit and a current account deficit equal to 4% of the country’s GDP.
Newsinc24 Team





Related Items
G7 trade talks target critical minerals as US-EU tariff rift strains unity
Bangladesh's ruling BNP hails BJP's historic Bengal win
India, US very close to trade deal, need to get over last hurdle: Landau