How Terrorism Hampers Progress- Part II:A Reality check on COP 28

The task, therefore, in Dubai is both formidable and fractious. Immediate crises loom large and cast an eclipse over outcomes that we so desperately seek. 
Terrorism's Role: A Missing Piece in Global Discourse 
Terrorism has never been discussed as a factor that affects obtaining progress on Global Environmental Goals. This omission seems both glaring and shocking in the background of terrorist activities across the globe duly and defiantly supported and financed by nations that must play a crucial role in achieving mitigated carbon emissions. For instance, many of the fossil fuel producing nations whose commitments are crucial in achieving any progress openly harbour terrorist organisations on their soil; and support and fund terrorist organisation in their own country and based on foreign soils. Terrorism requires all the natural resources that we are seeking to conserve. The economy of many of these countries is entirely dependent on producing fossil fuels. Terrorism leads to increased demand of these resources and those supporting terrorism act clearly in defiance and opposition of the global intent, rather hypocritically trumpeted by the same countries who openly work against them.
Seven Arguments Linking Terrorism to Environmental Risks
Arguably terrorism itself may not directly contribute to environmental degradation, carbon emissions, or global warming, it can certainly impede progress in addressing these critical issues in several ways. Here are seven arguments for bring terrorism on board as a factor of grave risk in the pursuit of environmental sustainability goals:
•-Resource Diversion: Counterterrorism efforts often require significant resources, both financial and human. When governments and organizations are focused on addressing security threats, they may divert resources away from environmental initiatives. This resource diversion can hinder the implementation of sustainable practices and the development of green technologies.
•-Political Instability: Terrorism can lead to political instability, which, in turn, can disrupt governance and policy-making processes. In environments marked by instability, it becomes challenging to establish and enforce regulations that promote environmental sustainability. Governments may prioritize security concerns over environmental protection, leading to a lack of cohesive and effective policies.
•-Infrastructure Damage: Acts of terrorism can result in physical damage to critical infrastructure, including energy facilities, transportation systems, and industrial sites. The rebuilding and repair processes may prioritize restoring functionality over implementing environmentally friendly practices. Additionally, the damage can lead to increased emissions and pollution because of the necessary reconstruction efforts.
•-Global Cooperation Disruption: Addressing environmental challenges requires global cooperation and collaboration. Terrorism can strain international relations and disrupt diplomatic efforts, making it difficult for nations to work together on environmental agreements and initiatives. A lack of collaboration may impede the development of effective global solutions to climate change.
•=Economic Impact: Acts of terrorism can have severe economic consequences, affecting industries and economies. Economic downturns may lead to reduced investment in green technologies and sustainable practices as governments and businesses focus on immediate financial concerns rather than long-term environmental goals.
•=Migration and Resource Scarcity: Terrorism can contribute to forced migration as people flee conflict zones. This displacement can lead to increased pressure on resources in host regions, potentially exacerbating environmental degradation. The competition for scarce resources may result in unsustainable exploitation of natural habitats and increased carbon emissions.
•-Security Risks from Climate Change: Climate change itself can contribute to security risks, including resource scarcity, extreme weather events, and displacement. These climate-induced challenges can create conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism and conflict, forming a feedback loop between environmental issues and security concerns.
The Need for Global Acknowledgment
It is high time that terrorism is brought on board as a factor and instrument of impeding environmental security of the globe and to be dealt with accordingly. Given the geo-political compulsions and polarisation, the move shall surely be challenged and opposed, even berated. But it will be to the peril of the globe, to push it under the carpet. Recognizing terrorism's role in impeding environmental security is crucial. Policymakers must acknowledge its impact to foster global stability, cooperation, and resilient infrastructure for simultaneous progress in security and sustainability goals. Ignoring terrorism's role risks undermining meaningful environmental progress.
It is seeking a tall order. And the prevailing atmosphere of hostility, revenge, distrust, conceit and self-preservation does cloud a reasonable approach. This may be a dark hour but isn’t the night darkest before the dawn?

(Uday Kumar Varma is an IAS officer. Retired as Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting)